An interesting article posted by my friend Fatima on Facebook:
“Spanking Kids Can Cause Long Term Harm: Canada Study”
TORONTO (Reuters) – Spanking children can cause long-term developmental damage and may even lower a child’s IQ, according to a new Canadian analysis that seeks to shift the ethical debate over corporal [...]
An interesting article posted by my friend Fatima on Facebook:
“Spanking Kids Can Cause Long Term Harm: Canada Study”
TORONTO (Reuters) – Spanking children can cause long-term developmental damage and may even lower a child’s IQ, according to a new Canadian analysis that seeks to shift the ethical debate over corporal punishment into the medical sphere.
The study, published this week in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, reached its conclusion after examining 20 years of published research on the issue. The authors say the medical finding have been largely overlooked and overshadowed by concerns that parents should have the right to determine how their children are disciplined.
The initial reaction to this post on my part was, well, duh because it’s a conscious parenting choice on my part not to spank. I feel a strong need, because I realize this is a sensitive topic, to strongly emphasize that my choice doesn’t make me a better parent. Simply put, though, I believe that emphasizing that you’re stronger or taller or older than someone is not the best tool to teach them what’s right or wrong. One day, we will not be stronger and bigger and taller. Principled living results from a person intellectually accepting something because they believe it to be right. There’s a line in the Quran (this is probably going to surprise our friends who believe in a vast conspiracy to force Islam on everyone) : “There is no compulsion in religion.” Put another way, you can’t *make* someone believe something is right.
I don’t think you can force someone to believe something, and I believe that physical punishments are an act of force.
I hear this a lot: some kids need to be spanked. I disagree. I just disagree. A child is a person. A total and complete person that just knows a little less about the world than I do. To drill down to the simplest explanation: I don’t spank children because I don’t spank adults. Shut up. Perverts.
I also don’t spank because I remember what it felt like to be spanked, both in an educational environment and at home. It was ineffective, shaming and made me resentful of the people who used those methods to assert authority over me. To this day, the adult in my life who has the most impact on me is the one who never laid a hand on me: my mother. All my mother had to do was tell me she was disappointed in me and I would straighten up. I cannot recall a single second of my life where I did not respect my mother. Not even when I was extremely young. And I’ll tell you this, kids aren’t born respecting their parents, their parents earn that respect. My mother earned her respect from me somehow without every laying a hand on me.
(Okay, there was this one time that she slapped me when I was sixteen, but I totally deserved that. And, also, she apologized for losing her temper. It’s just that she thought I was lying dead in a ditch because she didn’t know where I was for eight hours and I was supposed to be at school).
People who disagree about this seldom change their minds or find compromises they can agree on as evidenced by a discussion I had on the show CYR (episode 20) a few years ago.
All of that up there was my initial reaction to the Canadian study. My second reaction was far more philosophically based than controversially based, and I’m hoping you latch on to this part instead of the first. How can we as a society, dare I say, species consider eliminating the use of physical discipline when it permeates the highest levels of our society? I feel like that’s pretty hypocritical.
Spanking your kids is supposedly bad according to this latest research, but dropping bombs on country because you suspect that they have nuclear capabilities is okay? See, if we accept that spanking kids is definitely, absolutely not okay… well, we’d have to reassess paradigms that allow us to push the boundaries of what we believe are appropriate responses to international situations where we feel a particular nation or people need to be “taught a lesson” for a perceived or real threat.
You know what I mean?
I love film. I love watching actors that are “artists,”not performers, do their thing. I love good dialogue, riveting plot, beautiful scenery, subtle and yet breathtaking direction.
But I hate watching other people get awards.
It’s not an envy thing, I promise. I just find it all so boring. It’s like watching a party [...]
I love film. I love watching actors that are “artists,”not performers, do their thing. I love good dialogue, riveting plot, beautiful scenery, subtle and yet breathtaking direction.
But I hate watching other people get awards.
It’s not an envy thing, I promise. I just find it all so boring. It’s like watching a party you haven’t been invited to. That? Is not fun to me. I understand the fascination the the Oscars, though I assume seeing your favorite actor or actress get an award for doing a good job is simultaneously made pleasurable by seeing them wear your favorite designer? Hey, I’m not here to judge, only to complain about “not getting it.”
Angelina Jolie happens to be my favorite actress because I don’t live a world where talent and stealing Jennifer Aniston’s husband are somehow diametrically opposed, but I don’t care if the “Academy” thinks she did a good job in whatever movie she was in this year. Was she even in a movie this year? I can’t remember. Not the point.
Who is the Academy, anyway?
Which brings me to the actual point.
An op-ed piece by Jessie Jackson in the Chicago Sun Times answers that question:
A remarkable investigation by Los Angeles Times reporters pierced the screen of secrecy to reveal that the voting members are a stunning 94 percent Caucasian and 77 percent male. Only 2 percent are African American, and less than 2 percent are Latino. Their median age is 62, and only 14 percent are younger than 50.
I notice that Asians don’t even figure in there. I assume because we’re too busy working out Calculus problems, manning call centers or beating our children for not practicing the piano for three hours a day. Furthermore:
In the 83 years of the Academy, the Times reports, only 4 percent of Oscars have been awarded to an African American. Only one woman has received the award for directing.
Maybe it’s not that the Academy Awards bore me.
Maybe it’s that me and those guys don’t think the same things are important?
Film reflects and impact cultural norms. Essentially, it holds the power to highlight the importance of social issues or to diminish them. It’s odd that an entity that’s entrusted with deciding which pieces are most important within this genre lacks ethnic, gender and even “age” diversity.
How much impact do you think an Oscar has upon the popularity and cultural relevance of a film? Is who decides what is “Oscar worthy” important?
-
Articles
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
-
Meta




